Quorum
92.2%
- Highest calibration score (92.2%)
- 92.6% pass rate, 11.5% turnout
- Steward-gated quorum modeled
Por favor espera...
Governance Health Monitor
Live calibration accuracy scores for all 14 DAO digital twins, measuring how faithfully each simulation reproduces real on-chain governance dynamics.
85.6%
Average Accuracy
2
Excellent (≥88%)
8
Good (85-87%)
4
Fair (<85%)
Each digital twin is backtested against real historical data over 10 episodes of 720 simulation steps. The calibration score is a weighted composite of five metrics: proposal frequency, pass rate, participation rate, token price trajectory (RMSE), and forum activity. Scores use Poisson-aware error tolerances for low-frequency metrics to account for irreducible stochastic variance.
20%
Proposal Frequency
25%
Pass Rate
25%
Participation Rate
15%
Price Trajectory
15%
Forum Activity
Quorum
92.2%
Dual Governance
88.7%
Quorum
87.8%
Token Quorum
87.5%
Quorum
87.0%
Majority
86.7%
Quorum
86.4%
Token Quorum
85.9%
Approval Voting
85.4%
Token Quorum
85.0%
Category Quorum
84.6%
Bicameral
81.8%
Token Quorum
81.8%
Quorum
78.0%
Use the research console to re-run calibration validation with custom parameters, or test counterfactual governance rules against any digital twin.